Difference between revisions of "Launch Vehicle"

From OpenLuna
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
The Launch Options for two [[mission 1]] possibilities:
 
The Launch Options for two [[mission 1]] possibilities:
  
Line 15: Line 14:
 
Piggyback on big booster (might be cheapest, but we'd most likely wind up on a GTO...not quite Lunar Transfer...ad 20% to Lunar Transfer Mass)
 
Piggyback on big booster (might be cheapest, but we'd most likely wind up on a GTO...not quite Lunar Transfer...ad 20% to Lunar Transfer Mass)
  
Something New: One of our team members is working on a new, pressure-fed liquid fuelled small booster family embodying most of the recommendations from USAF Lt. Col. John R. London III's [http://www.dunnspace.com/leo_on_the_cheap.htm LEO On The Cheap]. If successful, a dedicated launch service could be provided below the minimum capacities (and well below the prices of) the above listed boosters. Such a booster would have no immediate competition. The first step in moving ahead with this booster is figuring out if there is enough of a market for its services for it to be a worthwhile investment.
+
Something New: Several of our team members are working on new, pressure-fed, liquid fuelled, small booster families embodying most of the recommendations from USAF Lt. Col. John R. London III's [http://www.dunnspace.com/leo_on_the_cheap.htm LEO On The Cheap]. If successful, a dedicated launch service could be provided below the minimum capacities (and well below the prices of) the above listed boosters. Such a booster would have no immediate competition. The first step in moving ahead with this booster is figuring out if there is enough of a market for its services for it to be a worthwhile investment.
 +
 
 +
The [http://ascentroadmap.blogspot.com Ascent Roadmap]: is one plan to develop low-cost private access to space by the After Columbia Project.

Revision as of 14:33, 29 April 2009

The Launch Options for two mission 1 possibilities:

SpaceX Falcon 1e (can't inject directly to Lunar Transfer)

Orbital Pegasus (can't inject directly to Lunar Transfer)

Orbital Minotaur (can't inject directly to Lunar Transfer)

Orbital Minotaur IV (can't inject directly to Lunar Transfer)

Orbital Taurus (can inject directly to Lunar Transfer, but non- standard service)

Piggyback on big booster (might be cheapest, but we'd most likely wind up on a GTO...not quite Lunar Transfer...ad 20% to Lunar Transfer Mass)

Something New: Several of our team members are working on new, pressure-fed, liquid fuelled, small booster families embodying most of the recommendations from USAF Lt. Col. John R. London III's LEO On The Cheap. If successful, a dedicated launch service could be provided below the minimum capacities (and well below the prices of) the above listed boosters. Such a booster would have no immediate competition. The first step in moving ahead with this booster is figuring out if there is enough of a market for its services for it to be a worthwhile investment.

The Ascent Roadmap: is one plan to develop low-cost private access to space by the After Columbia Project.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox