|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Are member classes needed ?
| |
− |
| |
− | Break it down into two classes voting/non-voting or Active/non-active ?
| |
− |
| |
− | Break those down into more classes by age ? Youth 1-17, young adult 18-21, adult, senior 55+ , senior citizens 65+, octo 80+ centurion 100+ ?
| |
− |
| |
− | Down further into donation classes by amounts of cash, amounts of materials, and amounts of personal time.
| |
− |
| |
− | Then there might be life members or members emeritus, corporate, government, other NPOs ....
| |
− |
| |
− | Should seniority have a bearing ? (add stars to a member class annually ?)
| |
| | | |
− | Should family lineage have a place here ? ( 'Sons of the revolution' )
| |
− |
| |
− | Education level, nationality, eye color, gender and preference, diet, ???
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | It's pretty easy to have a lot more membership classes than members...... :)
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | Under the observed circumstances that most voting members don't, why not let anyone who
| |
− | wants to vote have a say ?
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | Membership dues, or any other contributions, should be recognised (or anonomised as desired) publicly.
| |
− |
| |
− | ges 6/14/09
| |